![]() Only 46% of organisations funded under the IAS were indigenous they received 55% of total funding. The process also fared poorly in realising the potential benefits of service delivery by indigenous organisations. “The IAS processes disadvantaged smaller Indigenous organisations with less experience in applying for competitive funding, and who lacked the resources to hire such expertise, compared with larger nongovernment organisations.” The shift to a competitive tendering process with the advent of the Indigenous Advancement Strategy “appeared to disadvantage Indigenous organisations”, argued the Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public Administration report: ![]() Competitive tendering can disadvantage indigenous organisations up against larger and more experienced NGOs, muting the number involved in delivering services to indigenous people, a Senate report has found.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |